A New Initiative Aims To Honor America’s Martyrs

April 30, 2026
The choice of July 5th intentionally aligns with the anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ 1852 landmark speech, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?,
As the United States prepares to celebrate its 250th anniversary on July 4, a new movement is underway to establish July 5th as “Martyrs Day.”
This initiative is spearheaded by Gloria J. Browne-Marshall, an EMMY Award-winning writer, playwright, and social justice attorney who serves as a Professor of Constitutional Law at John Jay College (CUNY). She is an author of works such as A Protest History of the United States. Browne-Marshall has previously served as a Resident Fellow and Visiting Professor at the Harvard Kennedy School and has litigated numerous civil rights cases.
In a press release, Browne-Marshall spoke about the concept of Martyrs Day. The author believes a key pillar of America is protest. 
“The Declaration of Independence is a protest document,” she said. “We are a nation birthed from protest. Since 1776, this country has seen many people lose their lives for the sake of equality under law.”
Professor Browne-Marshall emphasizes the cost many activists have paid to create a better, more equitable nation. Martyrs Day intends to honor that legacy and serve as a national day of remembrance for protesters who gave their lives in the ongoing struggle for justice.
The choice of July 5th intentionally aligns with the anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ 1852 landmark speech, What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?. In the speech, Douglas challenged the United States to live up to its founding ideals of freedom and equality.
Beyond a day of reflection, the Martyrs Day movement serves as a vital call to action for communities and organizations nationwide. The day will encourage the public to recognize activists, organizers, and social justice leaders from any era whose work advanced civil rights and equality.
Furthermore, the initiative seeks to foster historical memory and civic engagement through education regarding the long struggle for justice. Browne-Marshall envisions this as a moment to honor the legacy of those who helped make freedom a reality and to recommit to continuing their unfinished work.
RELATED CONTENT: 40 Years Of The King Holiday: A Promise Renewed, A Legacy Reimagined

© 2026 Black Enterprise. All Rights Reserved.

source

‘You have options’: What Dr. Pierre Johnson hopes Black women know after 27-lbs fibroid surgery

In this exclusive, board-certified OB-GYN Dr. Pierre Johnson opens up about the life-saving procedure and the prevalence of fibroids.
By the time Brionna Johnson, an expectant mother in Chicago, understood what was happening inside her body, the intervention plan was clear.
A 27-pound cluster of fibroids had grown alongside her pregnancy, and doctor after doctor told her that at 17 weeks pregnant, there was no safe path forward but to remove the fibroids, end the pregnancy, and prepare to have a hysterectomy. Then she found Chicago-based fibroid specialist Dr. Pierre Johnson. 
The board-certified OB-GYN at Loretto Hospital took on her case, which even some of the most seasoned surgeons turned down, and a month ago successfully removed the 27-pound cluster, preserving both her pregnancy and her uterus. She’s expected to deliver her baby sometime in August. 
Despite the rarity of her case involving a removal of fibroids—non-cancerous muscular tumors that grow in or on the uterus wall—during an active pregnancy, Johnson, who never says no to a case and treats women from all over the world, told theGrio during a recent interview, “I knew that I could do it for her.” 
“When I heard [about her case] I knew what it was. I knew that 99 times out of 100 that this was more of a pedunculated fibroid, meaning it was stalked off the uterus,” he explained, adding, “The trick was just to really get to the stalk and control that. And once I was able to transect the fibroid off of the uterus, then everything else was just getting it out. And so I’ve done that countless times.”
He admitted the active pregnancy, presented its complexities, but what also stood out to him was the social aspect of the case, the fact that she was a Black woman experiencing a complication during pregnancy and being pushed towards the most extreme treatment option. 
“There’s so much bias and discrimination in medicine, I can’t even tell you,” the physician said. “For her case, there were strong attempts to cancel it, to not let me do it, like, without even talking to me like, they tried to not even let me do her case, so it’s even bigger than the options.”
A post shared by Pierre Johnson, MD, FACOG, Chicago, IL (@doctorp23)
This success story arriving during Black Maternal Health Week, which ran from April 11 through April 17, and at a time when Black women are navigating a Black Maternal Health Crisis and higher rates of complications like fibroids, Brionna’s story is both encouraging and also very telling about how often Black women are pushed into more extreme alternatives for complications when a closer, more careful look is all that’s required. 
Presently, while 80% of people with a uterus in general will develop fibroids during their reproductive years, by age 50, up to 90% of Black people who have a uterus will experience uterine fibroids. They are also presently two to three times more likely to get a hysterectomy to treat fibroid growths than other demographics, according to data published by the National Library of Medicine. Looking at the numbers closer, while the research shows Black women and white women have hysterectomies at roughly similar rates, the primary reason being fibroids was twice as high for Black women as it was for white women specifically (61% compared to 29%).
Johnson, who has been handling cases like Brionna’s for 13 years, has his thoughts about why the stats are the way they are. Much about fibroids, including why some develop them at such advanced stages, remains unknown. But he said, “We do know that they’re coded by genes.” 
“It’s just not like they just come and just arbitrarily attack people,” he continued. “There’s a very prevalent gene amongst all women, not just Black women, that code for these fibroids.”
There are also other factors that many who develop them at such advanced sizes have in common, including chronic stress. 
“Women of color, you know, experience chronic stress and microaggressions, something more than anybody,” he noted. “That also plays a role in how these genes that code for fibroids are regulated and dysregulated.”  
Another reason the doctor suspects could also stem from a lack of access to adequate healthcare, another factor that people of color experience disproportionately. And for the ones who maybe have had access to care, Johnson said, for women of color, there’s a legacy of distrust of the medical field.
“The medical system has been disproportionately used to weaponize women of color throughout centuries in this country,” he said, adding that after centuries of that, what you are left with is daughters, granddaughters, and nieces with the horror stories of their mothers, aunts, and grandmothers of how they were pushed to the extreme, like “sterilizing them and performing hysterectomies unnecessarily.” 
Johnson also added how more and more women of color are starting families in their 30s and 40s after grinding in their careers and building their wealth in their 20s.  
“So now you have late 30s, early 40s, movers that are trying to now start families and have more advanced cases of fibroid issues,” he said. 
With so many potential future cases out there, or even current ones, Johnson hopes people know that, while limited, they do have options. Many people are often inclined to trust the word of the first person in a white coat they encounter. They have a medical degree, but we have gut feelings and are living in our bodies. Johnson encourages anyone who may not be fully comfortable with the first approach to seek as many different opinions as possible until they find a physician more aligned with their goals.  
When it came to Brionna, who did just that, he said, “It just showed me just how vital it is to really advocate for women in these circumstances.”
Discussing what he described on social media as the “biggest” surgery of his career, he said he hopes to be a “beacon of light for women of color.” 
“You have options, you have people that care,” he said.

More About:
Weekly New Episodes
Stream Now

source

Rep. Wesley Hunt on all 4 Black House Republicans leaving Congress: ‘I don’t care how many Black people are here’

“I’m being addressed not by the color of my skin but by the content of my character,” said Hunt, loosely quoting famous remarks made by civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Despite historic gains in the number of Black Republicans serving in the United States Congress, all four Black GOP members of the U.S. House of Representatives will be leaving by the end of the current session in January 2027.
When confronted about the mass exodus of Black Republicans leaving the House after years of the overwhelmingly majority-white party trying to recruit more diverse candidates, U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Texas made it clear: “I don’t care.”
“I don’t understand how that’s relevant,” said Congressman Hunt, who opted for an unsuccessful bid for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Texas instead of seeking re-election. He told Pablo Manriquez of MediaTouch, “I’m not here because I’m Black. I am here because I’m [a] qualified representative for Congress with District 38 and the American people choose who they want to choose. And the one thing I don’t want to get into is this game of race bait all day, every day.”
He added, “If there’s four, if there’s 10, if there’s none, we are talking about who is the best person that is best qualified to fill a seat, regardless of the way that they look.”
Hunt, a 44-year-old Army veteran, emphasized that he represents a “white majority district that President Trump would have won by over 20 points,” adding, “I won by 25 points the last time I ran.”
“I’m being addressed not by the color of my skin but by the content of my character,” said Hunt, loosely quoting famous remarks made by civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He added, “I don’t care how many Black people are here. I want the most qualified people that are here.”
Hunt is joining U.S. Reps. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., John James, R-Mich., and Burgess Owens, R-Utah, come January 3, 2027, when all four Black Republicans say goodbye to Congress. U.S. Senator Tim Scott, R-S.C., will return to being the only Black Republican on Capitol Hill.
Like Hunt, Congressmen Donalds and James are seeking statewide office in their respective states. Donalds, who has served in Congress since 2021, is running for governor in Florida, where he enjoys a comfortable lead in polls. James, who entered Congress in 2023, is running in a competitive Republican primary for U.S. Senate in Michigan, where he was recently booed by Michigan Republicans. Owens, who was elected to Congress in 2020, announced in March that he would not seek re-election.
The departure of the Republican Party’s bench of Black members comes as the party has escalated its policies and rhetoric attacking diversity, equity and inclusion led by President Donald Trump. For decades, the Republican Party has faced criticisms for its lack of diversity, particularly in courting Black voters. Electing more Black candidates was seen as an opportunity to win over more Black voters, who overwhelmingly vote for the Democratic Party.
In 2024, 83% of Black voters cast their ballots for Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, while 15% voted for Trump. While the president remains deeply unpopular with Black voters, recent data from CNN shows the Republican Party has made a small but modest “generational” gain with Black voters.
Hunt, James, Donalds, Owens, and Scott served in critical roles in Trump’s 2024 campaign, including outreach to Black voters. Whether the party can continue to make gains with less Black representation remains to be seen.

More About:
Weekly New Episodes
Stream Now

source

Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Block Preventing Redistricting Vote Certification 

The move comes as the Florida state legislature advanced a new congressional map that could potentially give the GOP four new House seats. 
Last week, Virginia voters narrowly approved a constitutional amendment that would implement a new congressional map, giving Democrats a 10-1 advantage in House seats. While it looked like a victory for Democrats nationwide, on Tuesday, the Virginia Supreme Court upheld a lower-court ruling blocking certification of the vote. 
WUSA reports that Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley ruled last week that the voter referendum was invalid and blocked the certification of the vote from being certified. Hurley has repeatedly tried to stop the Virginia redistricting effort, though most of his prior rulings had been dismissed by appeals courts. The Virginia Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments to determine whether or not the redistricting process was conducted illegally. 
Virginia was a surprise entrant into the nationwide redistricting war. The Virginia Grand Assembly announced the redistricting effort last October, shortly before the state’s November elections. As Virginia’s redistricting effort requires an amendment to the state’s constitution, it had to go through several steps to be approved. The Grand Assembly had to vote on the effort twice, both before and after an election, before putting it to a public vote. 
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
Virginia Republicans have argued that the redistricting effort was illegal because early voting had already taken place before the Grand Assembly passed the first vote. State Democrats have countered that “before an election” means before the designated Election Day. While the Virginia Supreme Court allowed the voter referendum to proceed before it ruled, it’s still unclear where the court stands on the legality of the redistricting effort. 
The upcoming decision by the Virginia Supreme Court will be one of the most pivotal in the ongoing redistricting battle. As it stands, the Virginia map gives Democrats an advantage to take back control of the House during the upcoming midterms. Though a redistricting effort in Florida is looking to change that.
According to CBS News, the Florida House advanced a map that would create four new seats favoring Republicans. While Republicans hold a two-thirds majority in the state legislature, there were some no votes in the House, and a Republican state Senator has already spoken out against the map. The map will likely pass, but it will undoubtedly face legal pushback. Ahead of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis revealing the map, Florida Republicans voiced concern that redrawing the maps during a particularly hostile time for the GOP could stretch their voters thin and make incumbents more vulnerable. 
While it does feel like we’re entering a new era of politics in which politicians are choosing their voters rather than voters choosing their representatives, it must be noted that President Donald Trump is historically unpopular. Trump won the 2024 election due to his promises not to start any new wars and to lower prices. We’re just over one year into his second term, and Trump has started a new war that has dramatically increased fuel prices
As a result, Trump’s polling has continually trended downward. So while Republicans could ultimately have the advantage on paper, depending on how the Virginia Supreme Court rules, we can’t discount just how unpopular Trump, and by extension, the GOP, are heading into the midterms. 
SEE ALSO:
SCOTUS Callais Decision Delivers Major Blow To Black Voting Rights

Supreme Court Officially Reinstates Texas’ Congressional Map

Virginia Supreme Court Upholds Block Preventing Redistricting Vote Certification  was originally published on newsone.com

COMMENTARY: 5 Reasons Why Obama Will Beat Romney
Rest In Power: Notable Black Folks Who We’ve Lost In 2026
The 30 Most Beautiful Black Women In Hollywood
Donald Trump’s Mental Fitness The Subject of Intense Scrutiny Following Zany Fox News Interview
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
An Urban One Brand
Copyright © 2026 Interactive One, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

source

Big Boi Joins “We Ran The City” Documentary On 1996 Atlanta Olympics As Executive Producer

Copyright © 2026 Interactive One, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Big Boi is bringing his ATL stamp to the big screen, officially joining the upcoming We Ran The City documentary as an executive producer. 
Big Boi is bringing his ATL stamp to the big screen, officially joining the upcoming We Ran The City documentary as an executive producer. 
It doesn’t get more Atlanta than this. Having the Outkast legend involved adds a layer of authenticity to a story rooted in city’s history. The film will be directed by Jami McCoy, who also serves as an executive producer alongside Big Boi and Robert Slocum.
The documentary will take viewers back to the years leading up to the 1996 Summer Olympics, highlighting the groundwork, pressure and transformation Atlanta experienced while preparing to host the global event.
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
Atlanta 1996: We Ran The City delves into Atlanta’s dynamic and often tumultuous transformation during the years leading up to the 1996 Olympics. Through the eyes of a diverse cast, including hard-nosed law enforcement officers, controversial politicians, influential entrepreneurs, and notorious criminals, the documentary paints a vivid portrait of a city grappling with growth, crime, and political intrigue.”
The film will also touch on Atlanta’s emergence as “Black Hollywood,” showcasing how the city evolved culturally and economically during that era.
“Each story reveals a unique facet of Atlanta’s rise. The narrative is enriched by the insights of Dr. Maurice Hobson, who provides a historical and social context to the city’s evolution.”
With Big Boi helping shape the story, this documentary is set to give a deeper, more authentic look at a pivotal moment helped define modern-day Atlanta.
Big Boi Joins “We Ran The City” Documentary On 1996 Atlanta Olympics As Executive Producer was originally published on hiphopwired.com

COMMENTARY: 5 Reasons Why Obama Will Beat Romney
Rest In Power: Notable Black Folks Who We’ve Lost In 2026
The 30 Most Beautiful Black Women In Hollywood
Donald Trump’s Mental Fitness The Subject of Intense Scrutiny Following Zany Fox News Interview
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.

source

Former BET CEO, Debra Lee, Turns A New Leaf With Namesake Collection Of Luxury Handbags

April 30, 2026
Former BET CEO, Debra Lee, is pursuing a lifelong passion for fashion with the launch of a namesake luxury handbag collection.
After years of leadership in the boardroom, Debra Lee has launched a designer handbag line that fellow women powerhouses can align with.
On April 29, the former CEO of BET unveiled The Debra Lee Collection, a new line of luxury handbags featuring four styles — the Debi, Ava, Billie Mini, and Quinn. All crafted from sustainable calf leather, the collection marks a bold new chapter after her decades-long career steering a media juggernaut.
“This collection represents a meaningful pivot in my life and career,” Lee told The Hollywood Reporter. “After decades spent building organizations and supporting culture and creativity through my work, this is an opportunity to create something personal. More than that, I hope it inspires women to follow their passions, even if the path isn’t always direct.”
Crafted in Italy, the line is designed with the “accomplished woman” in mind, offering pieces meant to move seamlessly through every aspect of her life. Featuring four signature styles made from sustainable calf leather and offered in seasonal colors, The Debra Lee Collection brings fresh options to the luxury handbag market, with prices ranging from $900 to $2,300.
A post shared by Debra Lee (@iamdebralee)
It’s a true passion project for Debra Lee, rooted in a dream she first had in college before her career took her into the executive world. Raised by two seamstress grandmothers and a mother who taught her to sew, she had early ties to fashion.
But after graduating from Brown University, earning a master’s at Harvard University, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School, her focus shifted to business. She joined BET in 1986 as general counsel, rose to president and CEO in 1996, and later became chairman and CEO in 2005 — a role she held until 2018.
“Ever since college, I dreamed of working in fashion. Life took me on a different path, one I’m deeply grateful for, but that dream never left me,” she shared in an Instagram announcement. “Today, I’m proud to introduce the Debra Lee Collection: a luxury handbag line handcrafted in Italy, designed for the woman who moves through many worlds.”
Lee continued. “My mother taught me to sew. Both of my grandmothers were seamstresses. Craftsmanship has always been part of who I am. These bags are the most personal thing I’ve ever created. Sometimes life takes you in unexpected directions. But it is never too late to take a risk and pursue something that excites you.”
Now serving on the boards of Warner Bros. Discovery, Marriott International, and Procter & Gamble, along with founding Leading Women Defined and co-founding Monarch Collective, Lee created her luxury handbag line with the ambitious woman in mind.
“After more than 30 years in business, I feel ready to take this leap and create something entirely my own,” she said. “Handbags seemed like the perfect entry point; a limited collection built on the highest quality — equal parts beautiful and functional — designed for women whose style is as distinctive as their ambitions.”
RELATED CONTENT: Elevate Your Excellence: Exalting The Renaissance Of Harlem’s Favored Rose, Teyana Taylor

© 2026 Black Enterprise. All Rights Reserved.

source

Rare pigment worth more than its weight in gold found in Roman infant burials in York, UK

One of the gypsum burials being analysed
Photo: University of York
Some 1,700 years ago two infants were buried in York, UK, with the care, respect and expense usually reserved for Roman emperors and aristocrats, their little bodies wrapped in Tyrian purple-dyed cloth embroidered with gold thread.
The intense purple dye was among the most prized luxuries of the Roman empire, made in specialist dye works in Tyre, modern-day Lebanon, by crushing millions of murex sea snails. It is estimated that it took up to 12,000 of the molluscs to produce one gram of the dye, and it was literally worth more than its weight in gold.
The Tyrian purple dye up close
Photo: University of York
The discovery, by scientists at the University of York, is the first time traces of the dye have been found in textiles from York, one of a handful of examples from the UK and an exceptionally rare find among child burials across the Roman empire.
Maureen Carroll, a professor of Roman archaeology at the University of York, is overseeing the multidisciplinary Seeing the Dead project, which is studying an unusual group of burials from York, many excavated over a century ago on the land now covered by the railway station and museum. In a statement, she said the new discovery shed new light on the importance of children in Roman York.
“This remarkable discovery tells us a lot about the importance of children in Roman York and the willingness of the family to give their baby the best possible send off in tragic circumstances,” she said in a statement. It offers a counterpoint to some early Roman legal texts, which state that it was improper even to mourn publicly the death of a child under one year old, at a time when infant mortality was as high as one in three.
York has the largest group in the UK of the “gypsum burials”, a funeral rite—still not fully understood by archaeologists—in which liquid gypsum was poured into an open coffin or sarcophagus before it was closed. The result was effectively a layer of plaster preserving the impression of the body and even traces of the fabric shrouds, usually centuries after the actual remains decayed. In some of the York cases the Victorian excavators kept only the coffins and the gypsum casts, discarding any surviving organic material—to the dismay of modern scientists.
The burials date from the late third- or early fourth-century AD—the same period as the famous Spitalfields Woman in London, whose intact coffin and sarcophagus was opened on live television in 1999 at the Museum of London, revealing contents including a Tyrian purple and gold wrap. In York one infant, aged around two, was buried between two adults in a stone sarcophagus now on display at the Yorkshire Museum. The other much younger baby, no more than a few months old, was remarkably given its own tiny lead coffin, and covered in two layers of textiles, a tassled shawl and over that a fine textile of Tyrian purple-and-gold embroidery—a visible symbol of wealth and status—before the coffin was closed.
In both burials, although the fabric had decayed, the gypsum preserved clear impressions of the Tyrian-dyed fabric, and even faint traces of colour. Scientists extracted minute samples of the colour and subjected it to tests including liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, which revealed the main chemical compound of Tyrian purple.
Tests continue on these and others of the gypsum burials, as part of the project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Archaeologists found swords, jewellery and ear wax removers at the site
The finding of 59 sarcophagi and dozens of statuettes in Saqqara is just “the beginning of the big discovery” Egypt’s antiquities minister says
Archaeologists are “blown away” by the levels of preservation of the finds at Holborn Viaduct, which also include five oak coffins, a decorated lamp, a glass vial, and jet and amber beads
The ‘Marlow Warlord’ was buried with his weapons and luxuries for 1,400 years

source

Louisiana governor to reportedly target Black congressmen after SCOTUS ruling: ‘You should be as upset as we are’

“This is bigger than Louisiana. This is bigger than the Congressional Black Caucus. This is about our democracy,” says U.S. Rep. Troy Carter.
Less than a day after the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act and declared Louisiana’s congressional map racially discriminatory against white voters, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry has expressed his intention to suspend next month’s primary elections in order to have state legislators redraw the state’s map, targeting the state’s two Democratic congressmen, who are both Black.
As a result, U.S. Reps. Troy Carter, who represents the 2nd Congressional District, and Cleo Fields, who represents the 6th Congressional District, could be redrawn into other districts, sealing their defeats in this year’s midterm elections–or pitting them against each other. Fields, whose seat was at the center of Wednesday’s Louisiana v. Callais case, is almost certainly to be targeted.
In a statement released on Thursday, Governor Landry announced his office and the legislature are working on a path forward ahead of the state’s May 16 primary, two days before early voting was set to begin. Landry’s move comes after the Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruled that Louisiana’s current map, which contains a previously litigated second majority-Black district, is unconstitutional.
The map was intended to satisfy the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by giving Black voters, who make up one-third of Louisiana’s population, two opportunities to elect their representatives to the U.S. House through majority-minority districts. The Supreme Court, however, ruled on Wednesday that the second majority-Black district was not protected under Section 2 of the VRA and violated white voters’ 14th Amendment right under the Equal Protection clause.
The court also ruled that, moving forward, claims of racial discrimination in voting practices would have to be proven as intentional. Because Black voters overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, targeting them is based on partisanship and not race, the court essentially argues.
“The court is saying…you can’t say that gerrymandering that the state says is partisan is somehow racist, because Black people tend to vote for Democrats anyway,” Damon Hewitt, executive director at Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, told theGrio. “The jurisprudence is this assumption that partisanship is good and that partisanship can mask racism.”
Wednesday’s ruling now gives states the green light to target majority-Black districts traditionally represented by Black members of Congress that were previously considered protected under the Voting Rights Act.
During a Congressional Black Caucus press conference on Capitol Hill following the SCOTUS ruling, Congressman Fields, who entered Congress in 2025, noted that, given the Louisiana v. Callais case, he’s “never served a day in Congress without a lawsuit in the Supreme Court.” Acknowledging an inevitably redrawn map targeting his district, Fields said, “If you tell me that I got to jump a certain height, I could probably do that. Tell me I got to run a certain distance, I could probably do that too. But if you tell me I have to be white to serve in Congress from Louisiana, I can’t do nothing about that.”
Congressman Troy, who’s also in jeopardy of Republicans’ anticipated gerrymandering, said, “This is bigger than Louisiana. This is bigger than the Congressional Black Caucus. This is about our democracy.” He explained, “What this really means is far deeper than Louisiana; the impacts go throughout every congressional district, every school board district, every legislative district, every city council district.”
Republicans and Democrats are now engaged in a nationwide gerrymandering battle after President Donald Trump, seeking to keep his party in control of Congress and evade congressional oversight and possible impeachment, pushed for Republican-controlled states to redraw their congressional maps to gain more seats. Following Republicans’ successful redistricting in Texas, North Carolina, Ohio, Missouri and Utah, Democrats have hit back with major redistricting in California and Virginia.
Rep. Troy, who, along with CBC members, called for new legislation to restore voting rights, urged Americans to stand with Democrats and pro-justice leaders to fight back against Trump-led gerrymandering in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s consequential ruling.
“If you care about justice, freedom, and fair elections, you should be as upset as we are,” said the Louisiana congressman. “You should be willing to band with us, to defend our Constitution, to defend our rule of law; to make sure that no one person, whoever that person may be, has the right to singularly tip the scales.”

More About:
Weekly New Episodes
Stream Now

source

Teyana Taylor pushes through Billboard Women in Music tech mishap

Teyana Taylor was among a list of women being honored for their success in the music industry.
The 2026 Billboard Women in Music Awards were held Wednesday night at the Hollywood Palladium in Los Angeles, with many celebrities and artists in attendance to celebrate women in the industry. Multihyphenate Teyana Taylor was among the honorees but faced a technical mishap during her acceptance speech for the Visionary Award.
Legendary singer Dionne Warwick was on stage and presented Taylor, 35, with the honor alongside her son as they waited for the “Made It” artist’s acceptance speech to appear on the teleprompter. Taylor asked several times, “Can I get the teleprompter?” as she tried to laugh off the awkward moment, but the teleprompter later displayed, “Teyana Taylor, we have no script for you. Everyone exit stage right,” which she read aloud, according to The Jasmine Brand and INYIM Media.
A post shared by the Jasmine BRAND (@thejasminebrand)
“They messed up my mic, my ears…” Taylor said, seemingly referring to earlier technical issues with her microphone and in-ear monitor, per INYIM Media. She then added, First my ears, now this. Come on…”
Taylor then said, “Everybody exit right,” before walking off the stage.
Warwick and her son remained on stage, and he said, “I don’t know. See you all later,” before they both exited as the awkward moment lingered.
Host Keke Palmer returned to the stage and joked about the technical issue, stating that they had “messed up my girl Teyana’s prompter.” Despite the hiccup, she insisted that the ceremony was going smoothly, per INYIM Media.
After several minutes, Palmer brought Warwick back on stage, and the “Walk On By” singer also called Taylor back, stating she had something to say. The Harlem native returned, accepting the Visionary Award and delivering a speech from the teleprompter this time.
When Warwick first appeared on stage, she spoke highly of Taylor, who is poised to portray her in the highly anticipated biopic about the music legend, INYIM Media reported.
#TeyanaTaylor was able to finish her speech at the Billboard Women in Music Awards after being prompted off stage due to technical dificulties. #awardseason
Billboard released a statement about the incident and commended Taylor for how she handled it.
“Tonight at Billboard Women in Music there was a glitch with the teleprompter, resulting in Teyana Taylor not being able to give her speech during her well-deserved moment. Before the show ended, Dionne Warwick returned to the stage and invited Taylor to share her heartfelt speech with the audience and celebrate her Visionary Award.”
Billboard representatives shared, “We want to Thank Teyana for her professionalism and patience in the face of an unexpected technical issue. Her voice, artistry and impact remain extraordinary, and we were honored to celebrate her as this year’s Visionary Award recipient,” the outlet said.
The ceremony highlighted notable women who are making significant strides in the music industry. In addition to Warwick, other presenters included Ciara, Brandi Carlile, Eva Longoria, Kim Petras, Lainey Wilson, Coco Jones, Tyla, Bella Poarch and Victoria Monét, among others.
Aside from Taylor, other award recipients included Kehlani, Impact Award; Tate McRae, Hitmaker Award; Laufey, Innovator Award; Zara Larsson, Breakthrough Award; Thalía, Icon Award; Ella Langley, Powerhouse Award; Mariah the Scientist, Rising Star Award; and KPop Demon Hunters trio EJAE, AUDREY NUNA and REI AMI, who received the Women of the Year Award, according to a news release.
More About:
Weekly New Episodes
Stream Now

source

Chris Brown Requests Judge To Block Mentions Of Rihanna Assault In New Housekeeper Civil Trial

April 29, 2026
Brown’s legal team argued that the mention of his past legal battle could unfairly sway the jury.
Chris Brown wants no mention of his previous legal troubles, specifically his Rihanna assault case, in his latest lawsuit.
The singer is currently embroiled in a legal battle with his former housekeeper, who claims that she was viciously attacked by his dog while working at Brown’s Tarzana home in 2020. As the issue heads to civil trial, Brown’s legal team has requested that the presiding judge block all mentions of his 2009 assault case regarding Rihanna.
In the lawsuit, filed in 2021 by Maria Avila, the housekeeper argues that Brown should take ownership of the attack and for failing to provide a safe working environment. However, Brown’s attorneys argued that any mention of the Rihanna case is not relevant to the trial at hand but could affect the jury’s decision.
According to the motion reviewed by WBLS, Brown’s lawyers called any mention of the assault “improper, irrelevant, and unduly prejudicial.” Furthermore, they say that the case, which occurred around 17 years ago, is not relevant to the civil trial, which concerns Brown’s proposed liability for the dog attack.
Instead, Brown wants jurors to focus on the facts regarding this particular case and not let his past assault issues sway their view on the matter. However, the plaintiff, Maria Avila, and her legal team have argued otherwise. Brown pled guilty to the felony assault charge against the Barbadian singer, for which he received five years’ probation, community service, and entrance to a year-long domestic violence program.
In her complaint, Avila claimed the attack not only caused severe injuries, but also emotional distress as she seeks damages. Her attorneys also state that Brown’s legal history is crucial to their argument, sharing that it helps establish a pattern over the 36-year-old’s conduct and credibility. Furthermore, she called his request for the blanket ban “overbroad, premature, and legally incorrect,” as confirmed in the filing obtained by Rolling Stone.
Brown intends to challenge this narrative in court, also arguing that she may have provoked the dog, which could have sparked its violent reaction. On the other hand, Avila believes that Brown’s list of prior legal issues could help validate her claim of conduct issues surrounding the singer, especially if his defense tries to portray his character in a way that undermines her trauma.
“If defendants or their witnesses testify in a manner that portrays defendant as nonviolent or non-threatening, minimizes plaintiff’s fear or trauma, or otherwise attacks plaintiff’s credibility based on emotional response, then prior acts evidence may become admissible for impeachment or rebuttal, even if not admissible in plaintiff’s case-in-chief,” detailed the filing.
As both sides make their claim over the relevance of the Rihanna assault case, the judge will determine how crucial its reference is to the trial. If the judge sides with Avila, it would allow the jury to base their decision on Brown’s responsibility for the dog attack, with his past legal woes in mind.
Although previously delayed, the trial remains scheduled to begin on June 15.
RELATED CONTENT: Tyrese Brings That Turtleneck Energy To NYC Streets In Bid For Usher & Chris Brown Tour

© 2026 Black Enterprise. All Rights Reserved.

source

Obama, Harris react forcefully to SCOTUS ruling on Voting Rights Act

“There is no question our fight became harder today, but I know we are up for the battle,” said former Vice President Kamala Harris.
Former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Kamala Harris reacted to the Supreme Court’s consequential ruling that weakens protections for Black voters under the Voting Rights Act, setting up what could be a cascade of congressional maps that draw Black voters out of districts where their votes can be most impactful in election outcomes.
“Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities – so long as they do it under the guise of ‘partisanship’ rather than explicit ‘racial bias,’” Obama, America’s first Black president, said in a statement following the high court’s Wednesday ruling.
As theGrio previously reported, the 6-3 conservative majority ruled that a Louisiana congressional map violated the 14th Amendment and was racially discriminatory against a group of white voters. The court also updated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, passed in 1965, to help end the disenfranchisement of Black Americans, particularly in the U.S. South, where African Americans were enslaved, lynched, and racially terrorized for centuries.
The Voting Rights Act enabled Black voters to cast ballots in local, state, and federal elections, transforming American electoral democracy and fostering multiracial representation. President Obama said the Supreme Court’s ruling, essentially upending that progress, “serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach.”
But, like the Voting Rights Act itself, which at the time restored rights that were stripped more than 100 years prior and after the post-slavery Reconstruction era, Obama said, “The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome.” He added, “But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers – not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.”
Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, said the SCOTUS ruling “turns back the clock on the foundational promise of equality and fairness in our election systems.”
“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was one of the last remaining federal protections for Black and brown voters against maps deliberately drawn to dilute their political power. That protection has been stripped away,” said America’s first Black and female vice president. “It is an outrage. But it is not a surprise. It is part of an agenda that conservatives set in place decades ago to steal power from everyday people and then cling to that power for generations.”
The Supreme Court’s ruling, which has reeled the civil rights community and Black community leaders, comes as Republicans across the country have moved to redraw congressional maps to give their party a political advantage over Democrats in elections. They have done so at the order of President Donald Trump, who set off a nationwide redistricting battle when he demanded that Texas Republicans redraw their congressional map in an unusual mid-decade redistricting effort. The objective is to ensure Trump’s party keeps control of one or both chambers of Congress.
In response to Trump’s clarion call, Democrats have fought back by drawing partisan maps of their own in states like California and Virginia. However, the difference with maps drawn by Republicans is that many of them, according to advocates and legal experts, intentionally target Black and Hispanic voters, who are high-propensity Democratic voters. However, proving the intent of racial discrimination is difficult.
Janai Nelson, a civil rights attorney who argued the Louisiana case on behalf of Black voters before the Supreme Court, told CNN, “It has left the American electorate vulnerable to racial discrimination that will run as rampant as partisan gerrymandering has in overtaking our democracy, and that has all been at the invitation of the Supreme Court.”
When asked about the Wednesday ruling, President Trump gleefully celebrated the prospect of Republicans adding more seats to Congress as a result of the Supreme Court decision.
“That’s good…that’s the kind of ruling I like,” said Trump, who didn’t know the particulars of the case and asked reporters to fill him in.
“Would you consider it a win for [Republicans]?” he asked a reporter, who gave him the affirmative. “I love it. This is very good. We can end this news conference right now.”
Harris said the court’s decision isn’t just motivated by politics but is “designed to give an upper hand to Donald Trump’s Republican Party, which faces the threat of losing the upcoming midterm elections.”
“We must pay attention to what happens next. The fight now returns to the states. Legislatures — particularly those in the South — will rush to redraw districts before voting for the midterms begins in just a few months,” the former vice president warned. “Already, Louisiana and Florida are planning to redraw their maps, and we should not be surprised if others rapidly follow suit ahead of the midterms and 2028. Their politically-motivated power grab is meant to protect elected Republicans from any consequences for their failure to make groceries, gas, health care, or housing more affordable for you and your family.”
She added, “They want to cheat and choose their voters, instead of the voters deciding who they choose. The mission before us is to restore the power of the people. There is no question our fight became harder today, but I know we are up for the battle.”

More About:
Weekly New Episodes
Stream Now

source

EU imposes sanctions on Mikhail Piotrovsky, director of Russia’s State Hermitage Museum

Mikhail Piotrovsky Universidad de Navarra via Flickr
Mikhail Piotrovsky, the director of the State Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg and a vocal supporter of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, is listed in the European Union’s 20th package of sanctions, which was adopted on 23 April.
It is a major move against a cultural power player who used to host European peers at one of the largest art museums in the world—the Winter Palace of the tsars—though leaders and cultural officials of many other countries still visit the museum, usually as part of meetings with Vladimir Putin.
Mikhail Shvydkoy, Vladimir Putin’s international cultural envoy, told the official Tass news agency on 28 April that the European sanctions against Piotrovsky “constitutes an even higher form of recognition for his work” and is Europe’s, not Russia’s, loss.
“Interaction with Mikhail Borisovich [Piotrovsky]—and with the Hermitage—is a boon for any cultural institution,” Shvydkoy said. “The absence of such interactions is a regrettable thing. And, I believe, these restrictions will bring no joy to any museum professionals in Europe or elsewhere.” A spokesperson for the Hermitage told The Art Newspaper that the museum had no comment regarding the sanctions placed on Piotrovsky.
Shvydkoy has been at the centre of cultural news recently following his announcement last month that Russia will be bringing a programme to the Venice Biennale for the first time since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Piotrovsky has run the Hermitage since the early 1990s, which is also when he met Putin, then a city bureaucrat back from a stint as a KGB agent in East Germany. In an interview with The Art Newspaper in 2021, Piotrovsky defined their connection to Russia’s imperial capital and each other. “It’s not that I’m Putin’s person since the early 90s,” he said. “Putin has been my person from the early 90s. He is from Petersburg. He had approximately the same job that I did. We both worked for the reputation of Petersburg. So indeed he is closer to me than many others.”
The official sanctions listing calls Piotrovsky out for being a “close associate” of Putin, who has “actively supported and justified Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”. It cites his comparison of the global role of Russian culture to the “special military operation”, the Kremlin’s term for the war. Piotrovsky laid out his vision of culture as a weapon of geopolitics in interviews with Rossiiskaya Gazeta, the official government newspaper, in 2022 and 2023.
In its announcement, the EU says Piotrovsky also backed “Russian legislation enabling the incorporation of cultural items from Ukrainian museums into Russia’s State Museum Fund” and “unauthorised archaeological excavations in occupied Crimea, including the destruction of protected Ukrainian heritage sites, thereby serving the Kremlin’s goal of legitimising its territorial claims under the guise of academic work”.
The document states: “Therefore, Mikhail Piotrovsky is supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.”
Three other cultural officials implicated in the Crimean archaeological digs are also listed in the new sanctions package.
On Tuesday 28 April, Alexander Butyagin, a Hermitage archaeologist who had worked for years on excavations in Crimea, was released by Poland in a prisoner exchange with Russia. Butyagin was arrested in Poland in December 2025 at the request of Ukraine, which was seeking his extradition on charges of conducting illegal excavations in Crimea.
At a presentation of his book I am an Arabist in Moscow on 28 April, Piotrovsky spoke about Butyagin’s release. “First and foremost, I must share the joyful news that today our colleague Sasha Butyagin—an archaeologist who had been arrested—was exchanged and released from a Polish prison,” said Piotrovsky, the Interfax news agency reported. “He has been exchanged; he is already on Belarusian territory and will be home very soon. So, everything is wonderful—and this, too, is part of our shared history.”
The outspoken museum chief is leading the St Petersburg ticket of United Russia, the pro-Putin ruling party, in national parliamentary elections this weekend
Canada is the first country other than Ukraine to sanction Mikhail Piotrovsky for his support of Russia’s invasion
Cooperation agreement follows Vladimir Putin’s foreign policy strategy to forge closer ties with Iran

source

Third Man Admits Guilt In Connection To Jam Master Jay’s Murder

The 2002 murder of Run-DMC group member Jam Master Jay has an additional lane of closure added after a third man admitted guilt in connection to the crime. Jay Bryant told a federal judge that he was responsible for allowing Jam Master Jay’s assailants inside a Queens studio to carry out the killing.
As reported by NBC News, Jay Bryant, 52, was charged almost three years ago, and at the time, Bryant pleaded not guilty. That tune changed on Monday after Bryant pleaded guilty to the murder charge in the Eastern District Court of New York.
Bryant confessed in court that he helped the men who carried out the murder inside the recording studio in the planned attack.
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
“I knew a gun was going to be used to shoot Jason Mizell,” Bryant said. “I knew that what I was doing was wrong and a crime.”
Bryant didn’t name any codefendants and came after Karl Jordan Jr. and Ronald Washington were convicted of the murder.
More from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of New York:
Joseph Nocella, Jr., United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Bryan DiGirolamo, Special Agent in Charge, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, New York Division (ATF New York), and Jessica S. Tish, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD) announced the guilty plea.
“More than two decades after the cold-blooded, execution-style killing of Mr. Mizell, an exhaustive investigation revealed Bryant’s role and today he finally admitted his guilt,” stated United States Attorney Nocella. “The prosecutors in our Office and our law enforcement partners never give up, no matter how long it takes, in the pursuit of justice for the victim and the victim’s family.”
Bryant will face a mandatory minimum term of 15 years in prison and up to 20 years in prison during sentencing.

Photo: Getty
Third Man Admits Guilt In Connection To Jam Master Jay’s Murder was originally published on hiphopwired.com

COMMENTARY: 5 Reasons Why Obama Will Beat Romney
Rest In Power: Notable Black Folks Who We’ve Lost In 2026
The 30 Most Beautiful Black Women In Hollywood
Donald Trump’s Mental Fitness The Subject of Intense Scrutiny Following Zany Fox News Interview
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
An Urban One Brand
Copyright © 2026 Interactive One, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

source

Stephen A. Smith Defends Klay Thompson From ‘Chirp, Chirp, Chirping’ Megan Thee Stallion’s Cheating Claims–’He Doesn’t Deserve That’

October Gallery Museum
Connecting People with Art since 1985
Stephen A. Smith is just the latest to comment on the Megan Thee Stallion and Klay Thompson breakup that has all of our timelines on fire.
Stephen A. Smith is taking the side of a certain baller who’s being dragged to Thee ashiest parts of hell for THAT Megan Thee Stallion cheating scandal.
“He doesn’t deserve that,” said the sports analyst.
After Megan Thee Stallion announced that she was done with Klay Thompson, the internet immediately turned the breakup into a full-blown group project. As previously reported, Megan confirmed the breakup in a statement, saying “trust, fidelity, and respect” are non-negotiable for her, and once those values are compromised, there is “no real path forward.”
Fans rallied behind Megan, some people dragged Klay, and others questioned whether the details needed to be aired out publicly at all. The rumor mill even pulled WNBA player Lexie Brown into the mess, but Brown quickly shut that down, saying none of what was being said online was true and that she had “no involvement in this situation.” As of now, Klay still has not publicly responded to the cheating allegations or the breakup–but he’s got some folks speaking up on his behalf.
That’s where Stephen A. Smith came in with the exact kind of loud, finger-wagging commentary people expect from him.
On his Straight Shooter with Stephen A. show, Smith said he did not know what happened in Megan and Klay’s relationship and did not want to know, but argued that Megan made their private business public by posting about it.
In Stephen A.’s words, he wanted to know why the “chirp, chirp, chirping” rapper could not “just break up and go on your merry way” instead of telling the world what allegedly happened.
“I’m having this episode on YouTube because I’m asking why is she telling his business?” he asked. “I’m not saying whatever she felt was wrong. I don’t know what happened in their relationship. Don’t want to know.
“Ain’t none of my damn business. Ain’t none of y’all’s either. But Megan the Stallion made it so this Saturday night.”
Stephen A. also leaned hard into defending Klay’s privacy, asking what Klay had done to deserve having the details of their relationship blasted across social media and in gossip outlets.
“How come you couldn’t just say, ‘We had our time together, but I’m back being single again…’ and leave it at that? Why we got to dog the brother out?” He continued, “Is there a wedding that I missed? Were there nuptials that took place that nobody knew about?”
Smith also pointed out that Thompson has remained silent amid the fallout, noting,
“Klay ain’t bothering nobody… this man is going to go down as one of the greatest shooters ever,” and emphasizing that he’s “never uttered a negative word” about Megan.
“He doesn’t deserve that,” Smith added, calling the NBA star a “future Hall of Famer.”
Of course, Stephen A.’s take split people just like the breakup did. Some folks agreed with him and felt Megan should have kept the details private, while others thought he was putting more energy into criticizing the person who said they were hurt than the person accused of causing the hurt.
What do YOU think about Stephen A. Smith’s Megan Thee Stallion comments?
What do YOU think?
RELATED: Brick-Laying, Time-Wasting Klay Thompson Gets DRAGGED To Thee Ashiest Pits Of Hell For Allegedly Cheating On Megan Thee Stallion
Stephen A. Smith Defends Klay Thompson From ‘Chirp, Chirp, Chirping’ Megan Thee Stallion’s Cheating Claims–’He Doesn’t Deserve That’ was originally published on bossip.com
COMMENTARY: 5 Reasons Why Obama Will Beat Romney
The 30 Most Beautiful Black Women In Hollywood
Rest In Power: Notable Black Folks Who We’ve Lost In 2026
Donald Trump’s Mental Fitness The Subject of Intense Scrutiny Following Zany Fox News Interview
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
An Urban One Brand
Copyright © 2026 Interactive One, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
source

The October Gallery Museum places art in the community. Here are partner locations where you can have an art experience.
Some locations art is installed inside buildings and visits are during regular business hours. Other locations are by appointment only. Schools are not open to the public. In addition, we have many outdoor installations that you can enjoy around the clock. Check each location below for details. Tours are available upon request. 215-352-3114.
Here are some of our patrons that have donated art and art related items installed as part of our Art in the Community program. Thanks!
Watson and Sonia Brown
Stephanie Daniel
Chad Cortez Everett
Gail Gaines
Dr. Darryl J. Ford
Kelly R. Harrison
Deborah Kelly
Betty Ann D. Lawrence
David Lawrence
Leon McDuffie
Michael Muhammad
Jay R. Ogilvie
Marjorie H. Ogilvie
Junious Rhone, Sr.
Robin Rhone
Shirley Rhone
April Rice
Karen Roach
Monica Rocha
Steve Satell
Deborah Stephens
Staci Watson 
Stephanie R. West
Horace Wright

Sign Up Now
Art and art related items may be returned to October Gallery in good condition within twenty (20) days of the purchase for store credit ONLY – unless otherwise stated on an invoice.
Items on layaway or even items paid for will be held by the gallery for no more than ninety (90) days from the original sale date. Refund is in store credit ONLY – unless other stated on an invoice.

source

From Soda To Shots Fired: Taco Bell Worker Arrested After Violent Dispute

April 29, 2026
A Taco Bell worker in West Palm Beach is in police custody for shooting at a group of women following an argument over a fountain drink.
A Taco Bell worker in West Palm Beach, Florida, is in police custody after allegedly firing a gun and assaulting a group of women over an argument related to fountain soda.
Police say a dispute over using a water cup for soda quickly escalated when D’Mari Jy’Quan Patterson, 20, allegedly fired a gun inside and outside the restaurant, KATV reported. Investigators said three women had asked for a water cup, but one filled it with soda, sparking a verbal confrontation with Patterson that turned violent.
Video circulating online appears to show Patterson arguing with the women before pulling out what looks like a gun, racking it, and firing a shot.
Taco Bell Employee Opens Fire After Customer Fills argument over filling Water Cup with Soda pic.twitter.com/sJss7sXwc4
Investigators say one woman was shot and collapsed to the floor, while another suffered a graze wound, and a third fled the restaurant. Police allege Patterson chased her outside and fired again, missing her but shattering a window near the entrance.
The three women drove themselves to JFK North Medical Center, where two were treated for minor injuries and released, while the third was unharmed, police said. After the shooting, Patterson called 911, claiming a customer had jumped behind the counter. He admitted to firing the gun and told officers he placed it in the management office before they arrived, an arrest affidavit states.
Panicked diners rushed for the exits while others ducked under tables — some unsure if they had even heard gunfire, the outlet reported. In the aftermath, some patrons appeared to brush off the incident, treating the chaos as an unsettling reflection of a changing norm.
“I mean, it doesn’t surprise me the world we live in today,” one customer said.
“It’s not a problem — things happen, and we just take it as it is and go from there,” another added.
Investigators said Patterson claimed he believed the women were armed, but no weapons were found. After reviewing surveillance footage and witness statements, police said Patterson’s self-defense claim was not supported, noting the woman appeared to be leaving when additional shots were fired.
Patterson was arrested on April 27 and charged with three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm. Jail records show he remains in custody awaiting court proceedings.
The restaurant was temporarily closed as police secured the scene, causing traffic delays along Military Trail. The case is under review by the State Attorney’s Office.
RELATED CONTENT: Taco Bell Customer Shoots Employee In Dispute Over Change

© 2026 Black Enterprise. All Rights Reserved.

source